Monday, September 22, 2008

5th Offense

On Monday September 1st around 2a.m, Uriel Palacios got behind the wheel of his friend's car while heavily intoxicated. He borrowed this car because his own required a breathalyzer in order for it to start.
Around the same time that morning, five SMU students were sitting at a red light on their way back from a late night trip to Taco Bell. Less than a second after the student driver accelerated, a tremendous force slammed into the left side of their Tahoe, sending them sliding several feet and igniting the hood of the car with raging flames. Palacios had sped through a red light going near one hundred miles per hour, hit two cars before flipping his own, and left most of the wreckage almost unidentifiable.  Two people in one of the cars he hit died and all five SMU students were taken to the hospital, some critically injured.  
The news of this wreck is disturbing, but even more apauling is the fact that it could have been prevented.  The 22 year old drunk driver was driving on a suspended license, an arrest warrent, had alcohol in his vehicle, and a criminal record with two DWI convictions from 2003 and two DWI felonies from 2007 and 2008 (myfoxdfw.com).
I only wonder what the judge was thinking during the fourth court hearing of this man, and what compelled him or her to give Palacios another chance to straighten up his act, when he clearly had not been able to do so up to that point. 
If Palacios had been kept behind bars on his first offense, the lives of so many would not have been put at risk for five years.  His reckless and irresponsible behavior was bound to have dire consequences, it is beyond tragic that two people are dead because of him.  

The story of this man and accident makes me wonder how many other dangerous drunk driving criminals are still out on the roads because they were given four chances to stop breaking the law. I firmly believe that a person caught driving under the influence or driving while intoxicated should serve jail time without opportunity for bail, and have their license revoked for a year or more.  Tragedies like this destroy families across America, and the tolerance for drunk driving offenses should be zero.  


4 comments:

Adelaide said...

Drunk driving is an offense that should not be overlooked. It seems to me that this guy is not an unusual case of a drunk driving incident. I feel like stories like this are commonly in the news or being talked about around campus and at home. Drinking and driving is a tremendous risk, that no one should ever even consider taking. I am really glad that this blog entry was written, because students in college are definitely an audience that needs to be addressed about this issue. Drinking impairs judgement, and the decisions made while under the influence are ones that can cost so many people in so many ways. Trust me... drinking and driving is a decision you'll surely regret in the morning.

yayenglish said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
yayenglish said...

I am in shock reading this appalling story... Drinking and driving first off is the most selfish thing anyone can do. The moment they get behind the wheel, they are putting not only their lives, but the lives of their passengers and every person on the road in danger. Getting a DUI twice should be penalized more heavily, especially since many people drive under the influence and are never caught. I blame not only the boy who was drinking, but the judge who continued to let him drive.

Lori Ann Stephens said...

I wonder if you or other students think that sororities or fraternities should also receive the zero-tolerance treatment if someone underage gets ill or must be hospitalized from binge-drinking and no one intervened to stop the behavior.